Birth Date Bias in Football - An AFS Special Survey

May 25th, 2005 by admin


Football statisticians may have noticed an unusual distribution of birth dates amongst players and, in this AFS Special Survey, we examine this issueFootball statisticians may have noticed an unusual distribution of birth dates amongst players and, in this AFS Special Survey, we examine this issue.

Birthdates of Premiership players by month
January

163

February

122

March

131

April

92

May

102

June

87

July

76

August

121

September

262

October

230

November

224

December

169

We’ve used the AFS data set on 1779 English players attached to Premiership squads from the 1992-93 to the 2004-05 season. The dataset is available as in the AFS shop as AFS Data File No 4

The dates of birth have been banded by month giving the following results:

% of Births by Month - Comparison of English Premiership Players with the General Population


Month of Birth Number of English Premiership Players % Players No of Births in general Population (thousands)* % General Population
Jan 163 9.16% 577.8 8.31%
Feb 122 6.86% 531.1 7.64%
Mar 131 7.36% 584.7 8.41%
Apr 92 5.17% 565.6 8.13%
May 102 5.73% 595 8.56%
Jun 87 4.89% 583.7 8.39%
Jul 76 4.27% 609 8.76%
Aug 121 6.80% 594.3 8.55%
Sep 262 14.73% 595.6 8.57%
Oct 230 12.93% 589.7 8.48%
Nov 224 12.59% 558.1 8.03%
Dec 169 9.50% 568.7 8.18%
Total 1779 100.00% 6953.3 100.00%

*The number of births in the general population are total figures for 1993-2003.
Source: National Statistics website
Crown copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO

The distribution of birth dates of Premiership players shows clear birth-date bias with 14.73% of players born in September as against only 4.27% in July.

A similar pattern can be seen amongst the cohort of 196 current and ex-Premiership managers and caretaker managers:



Month of Birth No of Managers %
Jan 19 9.69%
Feb 15 7.65%
Mar 13 6.63%
Apr 14 7.14%
May 16 8.16%
Jun 11 5.61%
Jul 13 6.63%
Aug 9 4.59%
Sep 18 9.18%
Oct 22 11.22%
Nov 22 11.22%
Dec 24 12.24%
Total 196 100.00%


Why is there such a bias towards players born in September, October and November? The main reason, is the start of the school year at the beginning of September. During their sporting careers the older individuals in each year-group are more successful at playing football due to having extra months of development which makes them mentally and physically stronger than their peers who may have been born up to 12 months later.

This bias creates a problem for recruitment of the best players to elite football as potentially great footballers born in later months of the school year are being lost to football at an early stage.

This problem has been long been recognised by the Football Association, following original research by Caroline Sharp of the National Foundation of Educational Research in the 1990s. (See, for example, Craig Simmons’ 2001 paper ‘Season-of birth bias in association football’ published in the Journal of Sports Science which found bias towards older players in selection to the Football Association National School.)

According to Craig Simmons of the Football Association, the FA now includes education on this topic in all courses relating to children at the front end of selection to the professional game. Raising awareness of this topic will be extended to the grassroots game, where research suggests the bias is less dramatic but involves a lot more children.

Other than researching and raising awareness of the topic, the FA has been examining other solutions to the problem including the possibility of basing training classes on a rolling birthday intake, so that each child will have experience as both the oldest and youngest in the class.

Splitting the season into six-month cohorts would be effective in significantly reducing the bias - with the best way of achieving this, according to Craig Simmons, being to keep existing season start date in September but to have two birth-registration dates.

The Future

It is expected that the new FA Grass Roots Four Year Plan, will raise awareness of this issue and changes implemented within football should help mitigate the effects.

Within education, it is worth schools considering adjusting their physical education programmes - in some cases by combining school sports programmes across a number of different schools in the same area or making use of local sports centres in order that six monthly sports cohorts are possible. Recent research quoted in The Mail on Sunday (22/05/2005) has shown that children born in September are around 20% more likely to achieve an A* or A grade than those born in August so the time may be ripe for political action to make six monthly cohorts the rule in education as a whole.

Planning Conception?

As things stand, if you wish your child to be a professional footballer you should consider plan the date of conception for late January or early February to maximise the chance of the child being born at the optimal time (!) With new measures this will hopefully not be necessary.

All in the Stars?

Given the monthly differences in numbers of premiership players astrological explanations may be tempting for some.

Aries

108

Taurus

103

Gemini

93

Cancer

81

Leo

103

Virgo

233

Libra

240

Scorpio

234

Sagittarius

157

Capricorn

163

Aquarius

150

Pisces

114

% Dates of Birth of Premiership Players by Birth Sign


Birth Sign No. Of Players %
Libra 240 13.49%
Scorpio 234 13.15%
Virgo 233 13.10%
Capricorn 163 9.16%
Sagittarius 157 8.83%
Aquarius 150 8.43%
Pisces 114 6.41%
Aries 108 6.07%
Taurus 103 5.79%
Leo 103 5.79%
Gemini 93 5.23%
Cancer 81 4.55%
  1779 100.00%


However, studies around the world have clearly shown where seasonal start dates are in January (or in April as in Japan) then the birth date pattern shifts so that it is always the older children who are advantaged.

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

 
© 2008 11v11 Blog Powered by Wordpress - www.11v11.com